By Scott Massey
For those of you that have summertime Temporary Special Use Permits for mountaineering on Mt. Baker, Wash., you may have noticed some language that appeared to be different from past practices regarding insurance. It reads:
This was brought to my attention after several guides contacted New York-based Don Pachner, one of the industry’s leading insurance brokers, to clarify the language. The concern was that this language appeared to be doubling the commonly accepted amount of per occurrence general liability coverage needed for a 50-service day permit, a significant and potentially prohibitive increase for most operators.
However, after several contacts with the permit administrators, it was confirmed that this is an issue of interpretation and land managers’ discretion in managing guided use. It is also the language that has been in place for the past several years. The commonly accepted coverage amounts of $1M per occurrence/$2M general aggregate are still accepted, and there is no plan to increase the accepted amounts. To generalize for everyone’s sake, it is a good reminder to completely read through your permit language and to ask clarifying questions if there are items you don’t understand. Thanks to everyone who participated in this discussion and kept the AMGA in the loop. In case more resources need to be brought to the table, please continue to keep me in the loops on issues like this.
Category: AMGA News Tags: